1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Ranger | LS |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3931 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 280 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4940 mm |
