1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S60 (168 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | S60 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4580 mm |