1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2010 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Subaru Tribeca has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Subaru Tribeca will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 2010 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Ranger | Tribeca |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4864 mm |