1983 Ford Telstar vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 70 kg more than 1983 Ford Telstar.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Telstar | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Telstar | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1987 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
