1983 Ford Telstar vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 1993 Mazda 626 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda 626 (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1983 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda 626 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1983 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda 626 (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Telstar | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | 626 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |