1983 Ford Telstar vs. 2000 Renault Laguna

To start off, 2000 Renault Laguna is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Laguna (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1983 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Laguna weights approximately 310 kg more than 1983 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Telstar (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault Laguna. (151 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault Laguna.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Ford Telstar 2000 Renault Laguna
Make Ford Renault
Model Telstar Laguna
Year Released 1983 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 94 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 158 Nm 151 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3750 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2750 mm