1983 Ford Telstar vs. 2002 Honda City
To start off, 2002 Honda City is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 94 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Telstar weights approximately 88 kg more than 2002 Honda City.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Telstar (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda City. (121 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda City.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Telstar | 2002 Honda City | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Telstar | City |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |