1983 Ford Telstar vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Telstar (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 665 kg more than 1983 Ford Telstar.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Telstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Telstar (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Telstar | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | Telstar | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1695 kg |
