1983 Ford Telstar vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1983 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 440 kg more than 1983 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Telstar | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Telstar | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2760 mm |
