1983 Ford Telstar vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Ford Telstar. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Telstar weights approximately 75 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Telstar (158 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1983 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Telstar | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | 6 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |