1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1961 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 1961 Simca Plein Ceil (56 HP @ 200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Simca Plein Ceil should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 10 kg more than 1961 Simca Plein Ceil.
Because 1961 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 1961 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Tempo | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1961 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2360 mm |
