1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | EK |
Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |