1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1962 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 1962 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Tempo | Minx |
Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |