1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Tempo | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 101.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
