1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 55 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 1978 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tempo | Sapporo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2520 mm |
