1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1984 Mazda 929
To start off, 1984 Mazda 929 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mazda 929 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 1984 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | 929 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |
