1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tempo | FTO |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |
