1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1997 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1997 SsangYong Musso is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 1997 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | Tempo | Musso |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |