1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder
To start off, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder weights approximately 204 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Because 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Tempo | Pronto Spyder |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1314 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
