1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1999 Ford Puma
To start off, 1999 Ford Puma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 100 kg more than 1999 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 1999 Ford Puma | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Tempo | Puma |
Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2450 mm |