1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 654 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Tempo | Extreme |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2420 mm |