1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2000 Mini MK VII is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 375 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mini MK VII (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Mini MK VII will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 2000 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Tempo | MK VII |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2040 mm |
