1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2000 Skoda Fabia is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Skoda Fabia (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 Skoda Fabia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Skoda Fabia. (126 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2000 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Tempo | Fabia |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |