1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Octavia (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 240 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Octavia (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2002 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Tempo | Octavia |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2520 mm |