1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Sentra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,506 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Sentra (165 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 143 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Sentra (244 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Sentra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 2004 Nissan Sentra | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Tempo | Sentra |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2506 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1253 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
