1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 175 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |