1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 736 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Tempo | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 382 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1846 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2800 mm |