1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 10 kg more than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (170 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Tempo | Celica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |