1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (187 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota RunX weights approximately 68 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota RunX (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Tempo | RunX |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1178 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |