1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 Kia Amanti
To start off, 2006 Kia Amanti is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Amanti is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Amanti (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Amanti should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Amanti weights approximately 714 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Amanti (298 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2006 Kia Amanti will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Tempo | 2006 Kia Amanti | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Tempo | Amanti |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2910 mm |
