1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Stilo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Stilo (68 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 40 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Stilo (255 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2009 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | Tempo | Stilo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |