1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 58 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | Note |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2600 mm |