1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Because 2011 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo. 2011 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | Calais |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |