1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Mazda 5

To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 5 weights approximately 458 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 5 (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo. 2012 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: