1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Renault Logan

To start off, 2012 Renault Logan is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2012 Renault Logan. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Logan weights approximately 60 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Logan. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Logan.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Ford Tempo 2012 Renault Logan
Make Ford Renault
Model Tempo Logan
Year Released 1983 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2307 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 128 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 80.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1110 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2910 mm