1983 Ford Tempo vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5

To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. Both 1983 Ford Tempo and 2013 Mazda CX-5 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-5 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 378 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-5 (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: