1983 Holden Camira vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 1983 Holden Camira is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Riley RM A weights approximately 195 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira.
Because 1949 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Camira | 1949 Riley RM A | |
Make | Holden | Riley |
Model | Camira | RM A |
Year Released | 1983 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2870 mm |