1983 Holden Camira vs. 1956 Renault Juva
To start off, 1983 Holden Camira is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Camira weights approximately 260 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Camira | 1956 Renault Juva | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Camira | Juva |
Year Released | 1983 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2360 mm |