1983 Holden Camira vs. 1972 TVR M
To start off, 1983 Holden Camira is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR M would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 TVR M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Camira weights approximately 20 kg more than 1972 TVR M.
Because 1972 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Holden Camira | 1972 TVR M | |
| Make | Holden | TVR |
| Model | Camira | M |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |
