1983 Holden Camira vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1983 Holden Camira is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Holden Camira (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Holden Camira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Camira | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Camira | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |