1983 Holden Camira vs. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1983 Holden Camira is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira.
Because 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1983 Holden Camira has manual transmission. 1983 Holden Camira will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Camira | 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Holden | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Camira | Corniche |
Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |