1983 Holden Camira vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Holden Camira (86 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Camira weights approximately 74 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Holden Camira (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Camira | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Camira | Midge |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |