1983 Holden Camira vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 1998 Panoz Q9 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Panoz Q9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Panoz Q9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 553 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 1983 Holden Camira has manual transmission. 1983 Holden Camira will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Holden Camira | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
| Make | Holden | Panoz |
| Model | Camira | Q9 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
