1983 Holden Camira vs. 2002 Honda Civic

To start off, 2002 Honda Civic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Civic (108 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Civic weights approximately 50 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Civic (135 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Holden Camira 2002 Honda Civic
Make Holden Honda
Model Camira Civic
Year Released 1983 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1040 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2630 mm