1983 Holden Camira vs. 2005 MG ZT

To start off, 2005 MG ZT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MG ZT weights approximately 445 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Holden Camira 2005 MG ZT
Make Holden MG
Model Camira ZT
Year Released 1983 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1795 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 215 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1040 kg 1485 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2760 mm