1983 Holden Camira vs. 2007 Mazda 3

To start off, 2007 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 3 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda 3 weights approximately 448 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Holden Camira 2007 Mazda 3
Make Holden Mazda
Model Camira 3
Year Released 1983 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 256 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1040 kg 1488 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2650 mm