1983 Holden Commodore vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1983 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,891 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Holden Commodore (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Commodore weights approximately 338 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Commodore | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | Commodore | 66 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1891 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |