1983 Holden Gemini vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1983 Holden Gemini is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1983 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 222 kg more than 1983 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (106 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Holden Gemini | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Gemini | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 948 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
