1983 Holden Gemini vs. 1969 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1983 Holden Gemini is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Holden Gemini (66 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1969 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Holden Gemini should accelerate faster than 1969 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Because 1969 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Holden Gemini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Gemini | 1969 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Gemini | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |