1983 Holden Gemini vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1983 Holden Gemini. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 27 kg more than 1983 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (106 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.

Compare all specifications: